Current breast cancer clinical trials

Home: Educational Supplement: Section 3

Section 3
Radiation therapy for primary breast cancer

OVERVIEW

A number of important research questions on the role of radiation therapy in primary breast cancer are being evaluated in current clinical trials. One of the few local therapy questions addressed by the 2000 NIH Consensus Conference was postmastectomy radiation therapy in women with one to three positive nodes. A major Intergroup trial now addressing this question is particularly salient because of several recently reported randomized studies suggesting a survival benefit in this population.

The research question of whether improved local disease control affects long-term survival is provocative, but consistent with data from the International Breast Cancer Overview that demonstrated fewer breast cancer deaths in women receiving local radiation therapy. This effect was confounded by an increased mortality from cardiovascular complications, which was attributed to prior, imprecise radiation therapy techniques. Many researchers believe that the benefits of radiation therapy - like adjuvant systemic therapy - exist in a continuum, with the greatest absolute benefit occurring in patients with the greatest risk for recurrence.

RADIATION THERAPY OVERVIEW

When you obtain better local control with radiotherapy or with surgery that reduces the risk of local recurrence, you do get some decrease in the long-term mortality from breast cancer. An absolute reduction of about 20 percent in local recurrence seems to go with an absolute reduction of around about five percent in long-term mortality from breast cancer 10 or 15 years later.

So, although the meta-analysis of the older radiotherapy trials suggested no net benefit, when you look separately at the breast deaths and the nonbreast deaths, it actually shows that better local control does matter in terms of long-term breast cancer survival.

-Richard Peto, FRS

POSTMASTECTOMY RADIATION THERAPY

Recent trials have shown a survival benefit following radiotherapy in all node-positive women, but the degree of benefit is unclear in patients with one to three positive nodes. Part of the dilemma is based upon the discrepancy in the rates of locoregional failure without radiotherapy in those trials in comparison to failure rates reported in American series. The recent report by Recht and colleagues of the patterns of failure found in studies conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group notes that the risk of locoregional failure was 13 percent at 10 years in patients with one to three positive nodes. Although this is comparable to the 16 percent actuarial rate seen in the British Columbia trial at 10 years, it is strikingly different from the Danish studies, where the crude rates of locoregional recurrence were approximately 30 percent.

Based upon these results, the statement produced from the consensus conference convened by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology to address the controversies regarding patient selection for postmastectomy radiotherapy stated that while there was a consensus that patients with four or more positive lymph nodes should receive radiation therapy, the data were less clear for patients with one to three positive nodes.

-Lori Pierce, MD
2000 NIH Consensus Conference. Abstract

CONTINUUM OF RADIOTHERAPY BENEFITS

Some of the controversy in the one to three node subset is quite akin to what happened in adjuvant chemotherapy early on in its development. We used to think that patients with large numbers of nodes benefited, but patients with small numbers of nodes didn't. Then we recognized that patients with small numbers of nodes benefited, but we thought patients with no nodes didn't. Now we recognize that even patients with no nodes in certain subsets can benefit. This principle applies across the spectrum of disease that systemic chemotherapy reduces risk of failure; however, the absolute benefit is harder and harder to see as the absolute risk of failure gets smaller. I think the same must be true in postmastectomy chest wall radiation. It almost certainly has to help patients with one to three positive nodes. The question is, "What is their absolute risk of failure and is the benefit of the reduction conferred by postmastectomy chest wall radiation worth taking?" With the uncertainty surrounding the one to three node-positive group, we have proposed a trial for both pre- and postmenopausal patients to assess this. This trial - sponsored through SWOG - is now open and will be run through the Intergroup. There is a huge subgroup of women out there who fit into this category, and we hope that clinicians will enroll their patients in this study.

-Allen Lichter, MD
Presentation at 2000 Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Symposium

Recht A et al. Locoregional failure 10 years after mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen without irradiation: Experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1689-1700. Abstract

DANISH BREAST CANCER COOPERATIVE GROUP DBCG 82B RANDOMISED TRIAL: POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY IN HIGH-RISK PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER PATIENTS GIVEN ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY



Overgaard M et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 1997;337:949-955. Abstract

 

DANISH BREAST CANCER COOPERATIVE GROUP RANDOMISED DBCG 82C TRIAL: POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY IN HIGH-RISK POSTMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER PATIENTS GIVEN ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN


Overgaard M et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk post-menopausal breast cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial. Lancet 1999;353:1641-1648. Abstract

 

BRITISH COLUMBIA RANDOMIZED TRIAL: ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY IN NODE-POSITIVE PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER



Ragaz J et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Me 1997; 337:956-962 .Abstract

Ragaz J et al. Postmastectomy radiation (RT) outcome in node (N) positive breast cancer patients among N 1-3 versus N4+ subset: Impact of extracapsular spread (ES). Update of the British Columbia randomized trial. Proc ASCO 1999; 274. Abstract

 

PHASE III RANDOMIZED STUDY OF POSTMASTECTOMY RADIOTHERAPY IN WOMEN WITH STAGE II BREAST CANCER WITH ONE TO THREE POSITIVE NODES Protocol

PROTOCOL IDS: SWOG-S9927, GUMC-00223

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,500 patients (1,250 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study over 5 years.


OBJECTIVES

  1. Compare overall and disease-free survival in women with stage II breast cancer with one to three positive nodes with or without radiotherapy following mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy.
  2. Compare local-regional control in these patients with these treatment regimens.
  3. Assess the potential toxicities of radiotherapy in this patient population.

PARTICIPATION CRITERIA

  • Histologically confirmed stage II adenocarcinoma of the breast (T1-2, N1, MO)
  • Primary tumor no greater than 5 cm
  • At least 1 but no more than 3 positive axillary lymph nodes
  • Nodes cannot be positive solely by cytokeratin staining
  • Must have undergone a modified radical mastectomy with a level I and II axillary dissection (at least 10 nodes examined) in past 8 months
  • Surgical margins negative for invasive and noninvasive ductal carcinoma
  • No gross extracapsular disease or residual disease in the axilla
  • Microscopic extracapsular extension allowed
  • Must have received chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy after mastectomy
  • No more than 6 weeks since prior adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy allowed
  • Concurrent tamoxifen allowed

STUDY CONTACT

Lori J Pierce, Ph: 734-936-7810
Southwest Oncology Group
University of Michigan Medical School

Thomas Michael Pisansky, Chair, Ph: 507-284-4655
North Central Cancer Treatment Group

Stephen Barrow Edge, Chair, Ph: 716-845-5789
American College of Surgeons Oncology Group

Robert L Comis, Chair, Ph: 215-789-3645
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Lawrence J Solin, Chair, Ph: 215-662-7267
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

Lawrence Bruce Marks, Chair, Ph: 919-660-2127
Cancer and Leukemia Group B

Page 1of 2
Next Page

Top

 

Additional Sections:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |

On Section 3:
Radiation therapy for primary breast cancer
Page 1
Page 2
Select Publications

 

Additional Sections:

1
Breast cancer clinical trials
2
Management of the axilla
3
Radiation therapy for primary breast cancer
4
Optimal use of adjuvant tamoxifen and ovarian ablation
5
Aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting
6
Faslodex: An estrogen receptor downregulator
7
Optimal use of adjuvant chemotherapy
8
Herceptin as adjuvant therapy
9
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy
10
Bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy
11
Other breast cancer clinical trials
12
Breast cancer training opportunities and clinical trials at Northwestern University
 

Search our site
Home · Contact us
Terms of use and general disclaimer