| You are here: Home: BCU 5|2002: Eleftherios P Mamounas, MD 
 Adjuvant trial of capecitabine as therapy for 
              elderly women  Hy Muss is conducting an adjuvant trial comparing either AC or 
              CMF to capecitabine in elderly women. We do not have convincing 
              data that adjuvant chemotherapy provides a benefit to women over 
              the age of 70. In the Overview Analysis, there was a decrease in 
              the risk reduction with every decade of life. However, there were 
              few women over the age of 70 included in that analysis. Today, many 
              women over the age of 70 have a good performance status and no comorbid 
              conditions.  Yet there is still reluctance, especially in women with ER-positive 
              tumors who will receive adjuvant tamoxifen or perhaps anastrozole, 
              to use adjuvant chemotherapy. We actually need to compare adjuvant 
              hormonal therapy with or without chemotherapy in elderly women with 
              ER-positive breast cancer. If chemotherapy improves survival, then 
              we can look for regimens that are equally effective and less toxic. 
              In women with ER-negative breast cancer, most physicians are comfortable 
              using adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, Hy Muss’ trial may 
              be more applicable to elderly women with ER-negative breast cancer. 
 Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive, node-positive 
              disease  NSABP B-31 evaluates adjuvant trastuzumab in women with HER2-positive, 
              node-positive breast cancer. It is a two-arm trial comparing doxorubicin/ 
              cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab. 
              As demonstrated by the trials in metastatic disease, trastuzumab 
              cannot be given concomitantly with anthracyclines because of the 
              potential cardiac toxicity. We are evaluating whether they can be 
              given sequentially. B-31 has very strict criteria for the evaluation 
              of cardiac toxicity. An interim analysis conducted by the Data Safety 
              Monitoring Committee did not find a significant incidence of cardiac 
              toxicity associated with the addition of trastuzumab. In contrast, 
              the NCCTG, because of cardiac toxicity, had to suspend the arm of 
              trial 9831 that administered concomitant trastuzumab and paclitaxel. In B-31, we conducted an analysis of the first 100 patients’ 
              HER2 assays. There was significant inconsistency between the HER2 
              results obtained from nonreference laboratories and those obtained 
              with FISH at a central laboratory. The protocol now mandates that 
              a reference or central laboratory perform the IHC assay before the 
              patient is enrolled on the trial.  In the metastatic setting, trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy 
              prolongs median survival by five months. We hope that adjuvant trastuzumab 
              will also be of benefit. In light of the cardiac toxicity, we must, 
              however, be careful not to adopt trastuzumab into the adjuvant setting 
              before we have results from randomized clinical trials. Theoretically, 
              one could justify using trastuzumab in a woman with inflammatory 
              breast cancer; I would still be very hesitant without proven benefit, 
              especially in lieu of the side effects.  Adjuvant clodronate  NSABP B-34 will evaluate adjuvant clodronate, an oral bisphosphonate, 
              in women with node-negative and node-positive breast cancer. Data 
              from Germany as well as the Canadian and UK trials demonstrate that 
              clodronate reduces bone and non-bone metastases and also improves 
              survival. B-34 will randomize 3,000 women to three years of clodronate 
              or placebo. The choice of adjuvant therapy will be left to the investigator’s 
              discretion. We chose clodronate for this trial because it is the 
              only bisphosphonate with data in the adjuvant setting.  Clodronate is well tolerated compared to alendronate (Fosamax®). 
              If the B-34 results are positive, hopefully clodronate will be FDA 
              approved. In lieu of the ATAC trial results, it may be reasonable 
              to combine an aromatase inhibitor with a bisphosphonate as adjuvant 
              therapy. Eventually, NSABP plans to compare the bisphosphonates 
              to find the best one. It may, however, be difficult to use an intravenous 
              bisphosphonate in terms of patient acceptability.  Anastrozole in women with DCIS  We are close to initiating a trial in women with DCIS that will 
              compare anastrozole to tamoxifen. This trial will replicate the 
              ATAC trial in women with DCIS. Since these are very low-risk women, 
              it is important to determine whether the risk-benefit ratio will 
              justify the use of an aromatase inhibitor. The additional 50% reduction 
              in contralateral breast cancer, associated with anastrozole in the 
              ATAC trial, justifies the design of this trial in women with DCIS.  Implications of the ATAC trial results  This is the first time that an agent appears to be superior to 
              tamoxifen. Even though the disease-free survival and contralateral 
              breast cancer data are promising, it is still not known whether 
              this will translate into a survival advantage. In elderly patients 
              in whom one wants to avoid thromboembolic events and endometrial 
              cancer, the ATAC trial results may lead to the adoption of anastrozole 
              as adjuvant therapy. Eventually, anastrozole may be used in most 
              postmenopausal women. In terms of the ongoing NSABP trials, we currently 
              only allow the use of tamoxifen. However, that may have to change. 
              For our new trials, the NCI is already stating that we must allow 
              the use of an aromatase inhibitor. In Europe, the IBIS trial will 
              compare tamoxifen to an aromatase inhibitor as preventative therapy.  Proposed trial of XT in ipsilateral breast tumor 
              recurrence or local regional recurrence  We are planning a trial to determine the value of chemotherapy 
              in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) or local 
              regional recurrence. These patients have not been studied prospectively, 
              and it is not known whether chemotherapy can improve survival. Patients 
              with IBTR and local regional recurrence have a 50%-60% and 80%-90% 
              risk respectively, of developing systemic disease in the next five 
              years. In ER-positive patients, we will compare hormonal therapy 
              with or without capecitabine/docetaxel. In ER-negative patients, 
              we will compare capecitabine/ docetaxel to no treatment. Since most 
              of the patients will have received either an anthracycline or alkylating 
              agent as adjuvant therapy, we chose docetaxel as a noncross-resistant 
              agent. Capecitabine was added to obtain the maximum benefit.  
 Select Publications Page 2 of 2   
 |