|
You are here: Home: BCU 3|2001: Overview
Overview:
Progress in Systemic Chemotherapy of Primary Breast Cancer
Gabriel
N. Hortobagyi, M.D., FACP
Improved understanding
of the natural history of breast cancer led to the systematic evaluation
of adjuvant chemotherapy. Progress has been based on knowledge derived
from randomized clinical trials (EBCTCG, 1998). The following paragraphs
report salient points of progress.
Adjuvant chemotherapy
significantly reduces the annual odds of recurrence and death for
patients with primary breast cancer. The relative reduction in risk
is similar regardless of initial tumor burden or prognostic category.
The magnitude of benefit is greater in women less than 50 years
of age than in those at or older than 50. Combination chemotherapy
with two or more agents is more effective than single-agent therapy.
The optimal
duration of chemotherapy has also been addressed in prospective
clinical trials (Henderson, Gelman, Harris, et al., 1986). Prolonged
chemotherapy for 4 to 6 months is superior to a single perioperative
dose. The administration of chemotherapy for more than 6 months,
utilizing the same cytotoxic regimen, is not superior to 6 months
or less.
The initial
clinical trials used cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-flourouricil
(CMF) and related regimens. The second generation clinical trials
of adjuvant chemotherapy evaluated the role of anthracyclines in
the management of micrometastases (EBCTCG, 1998). Several individual
randomized trials and the Oxford overview of randomized trials demonstrated
that anthracycline-containing regimens were superior to nonanthracycline-containing
regimens, and that the addition of an anthracycline resulted in
an incremental reduction in odds of recurrence and death (EBCTCG,
1998; Levine, Bramwell, Pritchard, et al., 1998). Although the incremental
benefit of an anthracycline-containing regimen was smaller in magnitude
than that of polychemotherapy in relation to no adjuvant treatment,
it became evident in retrospect that several of the randomized trials
utilized suboptimal doses of anthracyclines. More recent information
suggests that anthracycline-containing regimens may be particularly
effective in patients with tumors that overexpress the HER-2/neu
oncogene (Paik, Bryant, Park, et al., 1998; Ravdin, Green, Albain,
et al., 1998).
These same studies
suggest that the utility of anthracyclines would be marginal (compared
to nonanthracycline-containing regimens) for patients whose primary
breast cancer had a normal expression of HER-2/neu. These data and
correlations, however, must be confirmed prospectively.
Over the past
20 years, much energy and resources have been expended on the evaluation
of dose-intensive chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. The results
of multiple clinical trials suggest that there is a threshold effect
for several of the commonly used regimens and that doses that fall
below such a threshold result in less or no benefit. However, there
is no clinical evidence at this point that continued increase in
dose intensity above the threshold dose results in improved outcome
(Hortobagyi, 1999; Rahman, Hortobagyi, Buzdar, et al., 1998).
The preliminary
results of randomized clinical trials exploring the value of high-dose
chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support in the adjuvant setting
have not demonstrated a reproducible and significant clinical benefit
superior to that of standard dose chemotherapy (Hortobagyi, 1999).
The role and
value of adjuvant hormonal therapy is reviewed elsewhere. The addition
of chemotherapy to hormonal therapy for patients with estrogen receptor-positive
tumors has been shown to result in incremental reductions in odds
of recurrence and death for both pre- and postmenopausal patients.
Similar results have been found for patients with node-positive
and node-negative breast cancer.
Recently published
results suggest that the addition of paclitaxel to an anthracycline
cyclophosphamide-containing regimen results in a greater reduction
in odds of recurrence and death than those obtained with the anthracycline
regimen alone (Henderson, Berry, Demetri, et al., 1998).
Several randomized
trials have produced results suggesting that the introduction of
a second noncross-resistant regimen after a course of primary adjuvant
chemotherapy would improve the therapeutic results (Perloff, Norton,
Korzun, et al., 1996). The trial with paclitaxel following the anthracycline
cyclophosphamide regimen falls in this category, and continued evaluation
of sequential, noncross-resistant regimens should produce results
of great interest.
Another important
topic in designing optimal adjuvant regimens is the timing of systemic
chemotherapy. The majority of the data (on which current management
is based) were derived from prospective randomized trials comparing
surgery alone with surgery followed by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.
More recently, preoperative chemotherapy (utilizing regimens similar
to those employed in postoperative adjuvant treatment) has been
evaluated in several prospective randomized trials (Fisher, Brown,
Mamounas, et al., 1997; Kuerer, Newman, Smith, et al., 1999).
It is apparent
that combination chemotherapy results in objective regression in
the great majority of tumors. This reduction in tumor size increases
the proportion of patients who are candidates for breast-conserving
surgery and also results in substantial downstaging in the breast
and regional lymph nodes. Not surprisingly, preoperative chemotherapy
does not confer improved survival when compared to the same regimen
used postoperatively. However, additional benefits-including preoperative
evaluation of sensitivity to chemotherapy-are associated with preoperative
chemotherapy (Fisher, Brown, Mamounas, et al., 1997; Kuerer, Newman,
Smith, et al., 1999). Ongoing trials will determine whether this
information can be translated into improved therapeutic results
by the timely introduction of noncross-resistant systemic therapy.
References
Early Breast
Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Polychemotherapy
for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials.
Lancet 1998;352:930-42. Abstract
Fisher B, Brown
A, Mamounas E, Wieand S, Fisher E, Robidoux A, et al. Effect
of preoperative therapy for primary breast cancer on local-regional
disease, disease-free survival (DFS) and survival (S): results from
NSABP B-18.. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1997;16:A449. Abstract
Henderson IC,
Berry D, Demetri G, Cirrincione C, Goldstein L, Martino S, et al.
Improved disease-free and overall survival from the addition
of sequential paclitaxel but not from the escalation of doxorubicin
dose level in the adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with node-positive
primary breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998;17,390a.
Abstract
Henderson IC,
Gelman RS, Harris JR, Canellos GP. Duration of therapy in adjuvant
chemotherapy trials. NCI Monogr 1986;95-8. Abstract
Hortobagyi GN.
High-dose chemotherapy for primary breast cancer: facts versus
anecdotes. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:25-9.
Kuerer HM, Newman
LA, Smith TL, Ames FC, Hunt KK, Dhingra K, et al. Clinical course
of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor
and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant
chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:460-9. Abstract
Levine MN, Bramwell
VH, Pritchard KI, Norris BD, Shepherd LE, Abu-Zahra H, et al. Randomized
trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil
chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil
in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. [National
Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.] J Clin
Oncol 1998;16:2651-8. Abstract
Paik S, Bryant
J, Park C, Fisher B, Tan-Chiu E, Hyams D, et al. erbB-2 and response
to doxorubicin in patients with axillary lymph node-positive, hormone
receptor-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1361-70.
Abstract
Perloff M, Norton
L, Korzun AH, Wood WC, Carey RW, Gottlieb A, et al. Postsurgical
adjuvant chemotherapy of stage II breast carcinoma with or without
crossover to a non-cross-resistant regimen: a Cancer and Leukemia
Group B study. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:1589-98. Abstract
Rahman ZU, Hortobagyi
GN, Buzdar AU, Champlin R. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous
stem cell support in patients with breast cancer. Cancer
Treat Rev 1998;24:249-63.
Ravdin PM, Green
S, Albain KS, Boucher V, Ingle J, Pritchard K, et al. Initial
report of the SWOG biological correlative study of C-erbB-2 expression
as a predictor of outcome in a trial comparing adjuvant CAF T with
tamoxifen alone. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998;17:374.
Abstract
|
|