When should postmastectomy radiation therapy
be utilized?
|
OVERVIEW:
A number of important questions about the role of radiation
therapy in primary breast cancer are being evaluated
in current clinical trials. One of the few local therapy
questions addressed by the 2000 NIH Consensus Conference
was postmastectomy radiation therapy in women with one
to three positive nodes. A major Intergroup trial now
addressing this question is particularly salient because
of several recently reported randomized studies suggesting
a survival benefit in this population.
The question of whether improved local disease control
affects long-term survival is provocative, but consistent
with data from the International Breast Cancer Overview
that demonstrated fewer breast cancer deaths in women
in receiving local radiation therapy. This effect was
confounded by an increased mortality from cardiovascular
complications, which was attributed to prior, imprecise
radiation therapy techniques. Many researchers believe
that the benefits of radiation therapy like adjuvant
systemic therapy exist in a continuum, with the
greatest absolute benefit occurring in patients with
the greatest risk for recurrence.
|
|
|
|
|
Would you recommend postmastectomy
radiation therapy for the following patients?
|
RADIATION THERAPY OVERVIEW
When you obtain better local control with radiotherapy or with
surgery that reduces the risk of local recurrence, you also get
some decrease in the long-term mortality from breast cancer. An
absolute reduction of about 20% in local recurrence seems to go
with an absolute reduction of about five percent in long-term mortality
from breast cancer 10 or 15 years later.
The meta-analysis of the older radiotherapy trials suggested no
net benefit. When you look separately at the breast cancer related
deaths and the other deaths, better local control does matter in
terms of long-term breast cancer survival.
Richard Peto, FRS
POSTMASTECTOMY RADIATION THERAPY
Recent trials have shown a survival benefit following radiotherapy
in all node-positive women, but the degree of benefit is unclear
in patients with one to three positive nodes. Part of the dilemma
is based upon the discrepancy in the rates of locoregional failure
without radiotherapy in those trials in comparison to failure rates
reported in American series. The recent report by Recht and colleagues
of the patterns of failure found in studies conducted by the Eastern
Cooperative Oncology Group, notes that the risk of locoregional
failure was 13 percent at 10 years in patients with one to three
positive nodes. Although this is comparable to the 16 percent actuarial
rate seen in the British Columbia trial at 10 years, it is strikingly
different from the Danish studies, where the crude rates of locoregional
recurrence were approximately 30 percent.
Based upon these results, the statement produced from the consensus
conference convened by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology
and Oncology to address the controversies regarding patient selection
for postmastectomy radiotherapy stated that while there was a consensus
that patients with four or more positive lymph nodes should receive
radiation therapy, the data were less clear for patients with one
to three positive nodes.
Lori Pierce, MD
2000 NIH Consensus Conference. Abstract
RADIATION THERAPY OVERVIEW
The most recent Overview involved the examination of the deaths
of more than 10,000 women out of a total of about 20,000 women in
40 randomized trials worldwide. No clear effect of radiotherapy
on total mortality was found, but the study found highly significant
differences in breast cancer deaths and non-breast cancer deaths.
Both of these changes were highly significant. The change in non-breast
cancer deaths emerged later than the change in breast cancer deaths,
the difference being 1.0% for breast cancer mortality and 3.0% for
non-breast cancer mortality at 10 years. Most of the excess non-breast
cancer deaths were due to vascular disease, which increased by 30%.
Jack Cuzick, PhD
2000 NIH Consensus Conference. Abstract
NIH CONSENSUS CONFERENCE CONCLUSION
There is evidence that women with a high risk of locoregional tumor
recurrence after mastectomy will benefit from postoperative radiotherapy.
This high-risk group includes women with four or more positive lymph
nodes or an advanced primary tumor. ... At this time, the role of
postmastectomy radiotherapy for women with one to three positive
lymph nodes remains uncertain and is being examined in a randomized
clinical trial.
2000 NIH Consensus Statement.
Full-Text
INDIVIDUALIZING POSTMASTECTOMY RADIATION THERAPY
This is a very interesting question that challenges the concept
weve had for so many years that breast cancer is a systemic
disease. While one can quibble with aspects of the Danish and British
Columbia trials, it is important that the subset that seemed to
benefit the most in terms of survival women with small tumors
with a limited number of positive nodes is consistent with
everything else we believe about aggressive local-regional therapy.
The ongoing Intergroup trial is very important. This study is using
modern radiotherapy techniques. One would hope that the incidence
of late cardiac morbidity is going to be very low. In the non protocol
setting, we evaluate these one to three node-positive cases individually.
We discuss radiation therapy in patients with large nodal metastases,
extracapsulary extension and large primary tumors, particularly
with lots of lymphatic invasion in the breast. We also discuss this
option in a woman who is very anxious to minimize her risk of failure
and wants to opt for treatments that may give very little benefit.
Node-positive disease is a continuum. I suspect that this will also
be true of the benefits of postmastectomy radiation therapy.
Monica Morrow, MD
|
POSTMASTECTOMY LOCAL RECURRENCE (LR) WITH
OR WITHOUT DISTANT METS (DM) IN 4 ECOG TRIALS (MEDIAN
OF 12.1 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP) |
|
|
|
Recht A et al. Locoregional failure 10 years after mastectomy
and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen without
irradiation: Experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology
Group. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1689-1700.
Abstract |
|
|
|
SWOG-S9927: PHASE III RANDOMIZED STUDY
OF POSTMASTECTOMY RADIOTHERAPY IN WOMEN WITH STAGE II
BREAST CANCER WITH ONE TO THREE POSITIVE NODES OPEN
PROTOCOL |
|
|
|
|
STUDY CONTACT
Stephen Barrow Edge, Chair, Ph: 716-845-5789
American College of Surgeons Oncology Group
Lawrence Bruce Marks, Chair, Ph: 919-668-5640
Cancer and Leukemia Group B
Eric Alan Strom, Chair, Ph: 713-792-3400
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Thomas Michael Pisansky, Chair, Ph: 507-284-4655
North Central Cancer Treatment Group
Lawrence J Solin, Chair, Ph: 215-662-7267
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Lori J Pierce, Chair, Ph: 734-936-7810
Southwest Oncology Group
|
|
|
DANISH BREAST CANCER COOPERATIVE GROUP
(DBCG) 82B RANDOMIZED TRIAL: POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY
IN HIGH-RISK PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER PATIENTS GIVEN
ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY No Protocol Link |
|
|
|
Overgaard M et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk
premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant
chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 1997;337:949-955. Abstract |
|
|
|
DANISH BREAST CANCER COOPERATIVE GROUP
RANDOMIZED DBCG 82C TRIAL: POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY
IN HIGH-RISK POSTMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER PATIENTS GIVEN
ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN No Protocol Link |
|
|
|
Overgaard M et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk
post-menopausal breast cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen:
Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial.
Lancet 1999;353:1641-1648. Abstract |
|
|
|
BRITISH COLUMBIA RANDOMIZED TRIAL: ADJUVANT
RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY IN NODE-POSITIVE PREMENOPAUSAL
WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER No Protocol Link |
|
|
|
Ragaz J et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy
in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N
Engl J Me d 1997;337:956-962. Abstract
Ragaz J et al. Postmastectomy radiation (RT) outcome in
node (N) positive breast cancer patients among N 1-3 versus
N4+ subset: Impact of extracapsular spread (ES). Update of
the British Columbia randomized trial. Proc ASCO 1999;
Abstract
274.
|
|
|
View References
Back | Top of Page
|