|  |  Home: 
              Educational Supplement: Appendix
 Patient-Specific 
              FactorsYoung Patients Aron 
              Goldhirsch, M.D., and Richard D. Gelber, Ph.D. Breast cancer 
              rarely occurs in young women. About 2 percent of female patients 
              with the disease are less than 35 years old at diagnosis (NCI, 2000). 
              Below the age of 20 the incidence is estimated to be 0.1 per 100,000 
              women, increasing to 1.4 for those 20 to 24 years old, 8.1 for those 
              25 to 29 years old, and 24.8 for those 30 to 34 years old (NCI, 
              2000). Breast cancer at a young age has a more aggressive biological 
              behavior and is associated with a more unfavorable prognosis than 
              when the disease arises in older patients. Specifically, tumors 
              in younger women are less well differentiated (higher grade) and 
              have a higher proliferating fraction and more vascular invasion 
              than those occurring in older patients (Walker, Lees, Webb, et al., 
              1996; Adami, Malker, Holmberg, et al., 1986; Chung, Chang, Bland, 
              et al., 1996; Kollias, Elston, Ellis, et al., 1997). A larger number 
              of positive axillary lymph nodes are detected in young than in older 
              patients. Results from two population-based studies indicate that 
              the risk of death is highest among the youngest and the oldest cohorts 
              when compared with patients of intermediate age (Adami, Malker, 
              Holmberg, et al., 1986), even when the analysis allows for differences 
              in initial tumor stage (Kollias, Elston, Ellis, et al., 1997). A review of 
              the National Cancer Data Base reveals that patients younger than 
              35 years of age have more advanced disease at diagnosis and a poorer 
              5-year survival rate than older premenopausal patients (Winchester, 
              Osteen, Menck, et al., 1996). Similar findings have been reported 
              from the National Cancer Institute SEER database (Swanson, Lin, 
              1994), from the Finnish Cancer Registry (Holli, Isola, 1997), and 
              from a recent Danish study on young patients who did not receive 
              adjuvant therapy (Kroman, Jensen, Wohlfahrt, et al., 2000), as well 
              as from several series described from single centers (Albain, Allred, 
              Clark, 1994; Noyes, Spanos, Montague, 1982; Ribeiro, Swindell, 1981). Typically, young 
              patients receive chemotherapy, and in many countries clinicians 
              have been reluctant to employ ovarian ablation or other endocrine 
              treatment (Kroman, Jensen, Wohlfahrt, et al., 2000). No adjuvant 
              systemic therapy was prescribed to young women with early stage 
              breast cancer thought to have favorable prognostic factors in a 
              large Danish study (Kroman, Jensen, Wohlfahrt, et al., 2000). In 
              that study, which included 10,356 women with primary breast cancer 
              who were less than 50 years old, the youngest (predefined as having 
              a low-risk disease and therefore given no adjuvant systemic treatment) 
              had a significantly increased risk of dying. The increased risk 
              with decreasing age at diagnosis (adjusted relative risk [RR] with 
              a cohort 45 to 49 years of age as a reference group having a RR 
              of 1) was 1.12 (95 percent confidence interval [CI] 0.89 to 1.40) 
              for 40 to 44 years of age, 1.40 (1.10 to 1.78) for 35 to 39 years 
              of age, and 2.18 (1.64 to 2.89) for <35 years of age. No such 
              trend was seen in patients who were considered at the time of the 
              study to be eligible to receive adjuvant cytotoxic treatment. Thus, 
              the negative prognostic effect of young age was confined to those 
              who did not receive adjuvant cytotoxic treatment, leading to the 
              conclusion that young women with breast cancer, on the basis of 
              age alone, should be regarded as high-risk patients and be given 
              adjuvant cytotoxic treatment. This conclusion relies on the assumption 
              that a worse prognosis predicts responsiveness to chemotherapy. The International 
              Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) treated 3,700 pre- and perimenopausal 
              patients with various timing and duration of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, 
              methotrexate, and fluorouracil (classical CMF with or without low-dose 
              prednisone, with or without oophorectomy) (Aebi, Gelber, Castiglione-Gertsch, 
              et al., 2000). Of these women, 314 were less than 35 years of age 
              at study entry. The trials were conducted between 1978 and 1993. 
              Relapse and death occurred earlier and more often in younger (<35 
              years) than in older (>35) patients. The 10-year disease-free 
              survival rate (DFS; ± SE) was 35 percent (+3) vs. 47 percent 
              (+1) (hazards ratio [HR], 1.41; 95 percent CI, 1.22 to 1.62; p<0.001) 
              and overall survival was 49 percent (+3) vs. 62 percent (+1) (HR, 
              1.50; 95 percent CI, 1.28 to 1.77; p<0.001), respectively. Younger 
              patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) tumors had a significantly 
              worse prognosis than younger patients with estrogen receptor negative 
              (ER) tumors. The 10- year DFS was 25 percent (+4) vs. 47 percent 
              (+5); HR, 1.49; 95 percent CI, 1.09 to 2.04; p=0.014. In contrast, 
              among older patients the prognosis was similar for patients with 
              ER+ compared with patients with ER tumors (10-year DFS 45 
              percent [+1] vs. 46 percent [+2]; HR, 0.94; 95 percent CI, 0.85 
              to 1.04; p=0.27). The largest difference in 10-year DFS between 
              younger and older patients was observed for those with ER+ tumors 
              who did not achieve amenorrhea (23 percent [+6] vs. 38 percent [+3]; 
              HR, 1.67; 95 percent CI, 1.19 to 2.34; p=0.003). This retrospective 
              analysis of treatment outcome suggests that the endocrine effects 
              of chemotherapy alone were insufficient for the younger age group 
              (only about 30 percent of the patients had some cessation of menses 
              from the 126 courses of classical CMF). Additional endocrine 
              therapies (tamoxifen or ovarian ablation, or a combination of both) 
              should be considered for these patients if their tumors express 
              steroid hormone receptors. Such endocrine therapies might be the 
              most effective component of their adjuvant treatment program. Additional issues 
              to be considered when approaching treatment and personal decisions 
              for young patients with breast cancer (excluding issues related 
              to genetic predisposition) are included in table 1. Treatment decision-making 
              for very young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer may be affected 
              by the strong emotional involvement of care providers. Furthermore, 
              the belief that an increased risk of relapse justifies use of cytotoxics 
              to increase the demise of cancer cells might also contribute to 
              lack of progress in evaluating endocrine therapies for this rare 
              presentation of breast cancer. 
               
                | Table 
                    1. Treatment and personal issues:evidence and current options
 |   
                |  |   
                | Issue 
                    for Discussion | Status 
                    of Evidence | Current 
                    Options (Sometimes Despite Evidence) |   
                |  |   
                | Local 
                  disease control, very late effects of radiation therapy | Young 
                    patients have a higher risk for locoregional relapse (Kim, 
                    Simkovich-Heerdt, Tran, et al., 1998; Elkhuizen, van de Vijver, 
                    Hermans, et al., 1998).
 No data on late effects on the heart of anthracyclines and 
                    taxanes plus radiation therapy.
 | Breast 
                  conservation with radiation therapy is considered a standard 
                  treatment (Guenther, Kirgan, Giuliano, 1996). Total or bilateral 
                  (prophylactic) mastectomy is increasingly discussed (Schrag, 
                  Kuntz, Garber, et al., 1997). |   
                | Pregnancy 
                  after breast Cancer | Pregnancy 
                  seems to be safe afterbreast cancer and after adjuvant systemic 
                  cytotoxic therapy (Kroman, Jensen, Melbye, et al.,1997; Velentgas, 
                  Daling, Malone, et al., 1999; Gelber, Coates, Goldhirsch, et 
                  al., in press), (except for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers) (Jernstrom, 
                  Lerman, Ghadirian, et al., 1999). Uncertainty about pretreatment 
                  with tamoxifen and neonatal genital tract malformations (Nakai, 
                  Uchida, Teuscher, 1999). | Reluctance 
                  to consider pregnancyeven for women with node-negative disease 
                  (Surbone, Petrek, 1997). Availablility of GnRH analog as an 
                  effective endocrine treatment, especially if given with tamoxifen 
                  (Boccardo, Rubagotti, Amoroso, et al., 2000). New endocrine 
                  therapiesare being investigated, mainly in postmenopausal patients. |   
                | Interpersonal 
                  and family relations | Younger 
                  women might be particularly vulnerable to the emotional distress 
                  of the disease (Northouse, 1994). | Psychological 
                  support (trials aretesting this type of intervention). |   
                |  |  References Adami HO, Malker 
              B, Holmberg L, Persson I, Stone B. The relation between survival 
              and age at diagnosis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1986;315:559-63. 
              Abstract. 
               Aebi S, Gelber 
              S, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Collins J, Thürlimann 
              B, et al., for the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). 
              Is chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with oestrogen-receptor-positive 
              breast cancer? Lancet 2000;355:1869-74. Abstract. Albain KS, Allred 
              DC, Clark GM. Breast cancer outcome and predictors of outcome: are 
              there age differentials? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994;16:35-42. 
              Abstract. Boccardo F, 
              Rubagotti A, Amoroso D, Mesiti M, Romeo D, Sismondi P, et al. Cyclophosphamide, 
              methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression 
              as adjuvant treatment of estrogen receptor-positive pre-/perimenopausal 
              breast cancer patients: results of the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant 
              Study Group 02 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2718-27. Abstract. Chung M, Chang 
              HR, Bland KI, Wanebo HJ. Younger women with breast carcinoma have 
              a poorer prognosis than older women. Cancer 1996;77:97-103. Abstract. Elkhuizen PH, 
              van de Vijver MJ, Hermans J, Zonderland HM, van der Velde CJ, Leer 
              JW. Local recurrence after breast conserving therapy for invasive 
              breast cancer: high incidence in young patients and association 
              with poor survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;40:859-67. 
              Abstract. Gelber S, Coates 
              AS, Goldhirsch A, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Marini G, Lindtner J, et 
              al. Effect of pregnancy on overall survival following the diagnosis 
              of early stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol (in press). Abstract. Guenther JM, 
              Kirgan DM, Giuliano AE. Feasibility of breast-conserving therapy 
              for younger women with breast cancer. Arch Surg 1996;131:632-6. 
              Abstract. Holli K, Isola 
              J. Effect of age on the survival of breast cancer patients. Eur 
              J Cancer 1997;33:425-8. Abstract. Jernstrom H, 
              Lerman C, Ghadirian P, Lynch HT, Weber B, Garber J, et al. Pregnancy 
              and risk of early breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2. 
              Lancet 1999;354:1846-50. Abstract. Kim SH, Simkovich-Heerdt 
              A, Tran KN, Maclean B, Borgen PI. Women 35 years of age or younger 
              have higher locoregional relapse rates after undergoing breast conservation 
              therapy. J Am Coll Surg 1998,187:1-8. Abstract. Kollias J, Elston 
              CW, Ellis IO, Robertson JF, Blamey RW. Early-onset breast cancer 
              histopathological and prognostic considerations. Br J Cancer 1997;75:1318-23. 
              Abstract. Kroman N, Jensen 
              MB, Melbye M, Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen HT. Should women be advised 
              against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment? Lancet. 1997;350:319-22. 
              Abstract. Kroman N, Jensen 
              MB, Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen HT, Andersen PK, Melbye M. Factors influencing 
              the effect of age on prognosis in breast cancer: population based 
              study. BMJ 2000:320:474-8. Abstract. Nakai M, Uchida 
              K, Teuscher C. The development of male reproductive organ abnormalities 
              after neonatal exposure to tamoxifen is genetically determined. 
              J Androl 1999;20:626-34. Abstract. Northouse LL. 
              Breast cancer in younger women: effects on interpersonal and family 
              relations. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994;16:183-90. Abstract. Noyes RD, Spanos 
              WJ Jr, Montague ED. Breast cancer in women aged 30 and under. Cancer 
              1982;49:1302-7. Abstract. Ribeiro GG, 
              Swindell R. The prognosis of breast carcinoma in women aged less 
              than 40 years. Clin Radiol 1981;32:231-6. Abstract. Schrag D, Kuntz 
              KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC. Decision analysiseffects of prophylactic 
              mastectomy and oophorectomy on life expectancy among women with 
              BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1465-71. [Erratum 
              appeared in N Engl J Med 1997;337:434.] Abstract. Surbone A, Petrek 
              JA. Childbearing issues in breast carcinoma survivors. Cancer 1997;79:1271-8. 
              Abstract. Surveillance, 
              Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program Public-Use CD ROM (1973- 
              1997), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Cancer Surveillance Research 
              Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2000, based on 
              the August 1999 submission. Abstract. Swanson GM, 
              Lin CS. Survival patterns among younger women with breast cancer: 
              the effects of age, race, stage, and treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 
              Monogr 1994;16:69-77. Abstract. Velentgas P, 
              Daling JR, Malone KE, Weiss NS, Williams MA, Self SG, et al. Pregnancy 
              after breast carcinoma. Cancer 1999;85:2424-32. Abstract. Walker RA, Lees 
              E, Webb MB, Dearing SJ. Breast carcinomas occurring in young women 
              (<35 years) are different. Br J Cancer 1996;74:1796-800. Abstract. Winchester DP, 
              Osteen RT, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on breast 
              carcinoma characteristics and outcome in relation to age. Cancer 
              1996;78:1838-43. Abstract.     |  |