|
You are here: Home: BCU 2|2002: Program Supplement: Dr. Mark Pegram
INTERVIEW WITH DR. MARK PEGRAM
DR. LOVE: I'm almost afraid
to ask you this next question, but, actually, this came up at one
of the case sessions here at San Antonio yesterday - 40-year-old
woman, 11- positive nodes, strongly HER2-positive.
DR. PEGRAM: Don't ask me that question. (Laughter) I've
seen that sort of patient treated in every imaginable way that you
can consider. There's no right or wrong answer. I still see these
patients occasionally being transplanted. I certainly occasionally
see these patients treated with Herceptin. I would not be surprised
if Herceptin is not going to be the way to go in such patients.
I think that there's a very strong chance that the Herceptin adjuvant
trials will be positive studies. The reason I say that with some
conviction is that if you look historically at therapies that prolong
survival in metastatic breast cancer, across the board, all of those
drugs have had even greater benefits in the adjuvant setting.
So, technically, if you look at the 10 or more node-positive subgroup,
they behave similarly to metastatic breast cancer. In fact, it is
metastatic breast cancer. It's metastasized to the lymph nodes,
which is the most common site of metastasis in this disease. So,
there is strong scientific rationale for treating them with Herceptin.
It's not the standard of care. We don't routinely do it, even at
UCLA, for all of our patients. We usually look for a study that
they qualify for first, we use it as our default, and we're lucky
to be able to have that as our reflex, so we don't have to make
the difficult decisions.
DR. LOVE: Let's talk about
the studies that are out there right now, the ones that you are
participating in, and the others that are out there that you find
interesting and important. I guess a lot of them are really in the
adjuvant setting. What are some of the ones that have you most excited
and what are some of the ones that you hear being talked about in
terms of the future?
DR. PEGRAM: Well, if we start with the adjuvant studies,
we're really excited about the Breast Cancer International Research
Group, Herceptin adjuvant trial. It's called 006. This is a study
that is testing conventional chemotherapy strategies, that is, four
cycles of AC followed by four cycles of Taxotere, to integration
of Herceptin.
There are two strategies to integrate Herceptin with conventional
chemotherapy. One is the, I'm going to call it the kind of a dummy
approach, where we're just going to add it to conventional therapy,
regardless of whether it makes the best sense or not. We do have
an arm in that trial that is AC followed by Taxotere plus Herceptin.
Now, we're concerned about that arm, because of the potential for
cardiotoxicity of Herceptin in patients who have had recent Adriamycin
exposure. For that reason, there's a very close scrutiny of that
particular arm by a group consisting of two cardiologists, medical
oncologists and other safety advisers. If there's any signal of
cardiotoxicity that arm will drop out. The third arm, which we're
most excited about, is the Taxotere-carboplatin-Herceptin arm, which
is TCH. It is a non-anthracycline synergistic combination of active
drugs that are synergistic. When you look at Taxotere-Herceptin
there's synergy. When you look at carboplatin-Herceptin there's
synergy. So, the three-drug combination is highly synergistic, and
we don't have to worry as much about cardiotoxicity in that scenario.
DR. LOVE: How long is the Herceptin
given?
DR. PEGRAM: It's given for one year in the BCIRG study.
DR. LOVE: In two arms?
DR. PEGRAM: That's correct.
DR. LOVE: And the third arm
is what?
DR. PEGRAM: No Herceptin.
DR. LOVE: With which chemotherapy?
DR. PEGRAM: AC and Taxotere.
DR. LOVE: Okay.
DR. PEGRAM: There's one study being done in Europe where
there's going to be a randomization between one year of adjuvant
Herceptin and two years of adjuvant Herceptin. That's the only adjuvant
study where the duration of Herceptin is a research question. In
terms of metastatic breast cancer, we have a lot of exciting trials
that we're very anxious to get results on. We just completed the
Phase II Taxotere-platinum-Herceptin trials, and we just presented
our data at the recent ECHO meeting in Lisbon. Both of those trials,
62 patients each, so a 124 patient experience now, the response
rates were between 60-some percent and 80-some percent. And time
to progression was between 12 and 17 months, which is really quite
extraordinary. This was in the FISH-positive subset.
In fact, if you look at the time to progression analysis on both
of those studies, with the TCH combination, the FISH-positive patients,
despite their worse prognosis because of the HER2 gene alteration,
are actually doing better than the HER2-negative patients treated
with TCH. So, really, for the first time, we're starting to see
a shift in the natural history of HER2-positive breast cancer, where
the HER2-positives are doing better because of the synergistic Herceptin-based
combinations. So, we think that's really exciting, and we think
that's going to translate to maximum clinical benefit in the adjuvant
trials.
Let me tell you about two other trials, which we're really excited
about, that involve this TCH strategy. Both of these trials are
in metastatic breast cancer. One is the BCIRG 007 trial, which is
going to be a randomized study between Taxotere-Herceptin versus
Taxotere-carboplatin-Herceptin. This will really test the platinum
synergy hypothesis in metastatic breast cancer.
Nick Robert and Dennis Slamon have a study that's very similar to
007, which is nearing completion of its accrual now, which is Taxol-Herceptin
versus Taxol-carboplatin-Herceptin. That study will be the first
to reach its accrual goal to test the platinum synergy hypothesis.
So, we're very excited about that trial. We don't have any results
yet, but we anticipate results in the new year. We're very anxious
and optimistic to really put this platinum synergy hypothesis to
the test because, if it works, it'll add even more support for our
adjuvant 006 TCH strategy.
DR. LOVE: Any reason to think
there's a difference in Taxol or Taxotere in terms of synergy with
Herceptin?
DR. PEGRAM: Oh, sure, there is. I mean, we've conducted
a lot of experiments in our laboratory now, using a bank of HER2-positive
breast cancer cell lines and, across the board, it looks like the
Taxotere-Herceptin interaction is synergistic, and the Taxol-Herceptin
interaction is less than synergistic. It's additive. So, that would
give some credence to the concept of using Taxotere-Herceptin as
the preferred taxane-Herceptin combination. All the studies that
we're doing at UCLA that involve Herceptin-taxane combinations,
apart from the U.S. Oncology-Robert study, which is just about to
close. It's still open at UCLA, but after that closes we're moving
on exclusively to Taxotere-Herceptin combinations.
Page 5 of 5
|
|