You are here: Home: BCU 2|2001:
2000
NIH Consensus Development Conference on Adjuvant Therapy for Breast
Cancer
Who
Should Not Receive Chemotherapy?
International Databases
Jonas
C. Bergh, M.D., Ph.D.
Adjuvant use
of chemotherapy and tamoxifen probably saves more lives than any
other medical therapy for cancer (Bergh, 2000; EBCTCG, 1998a; EBCTCG
1998b). Despite this major achievement, the principal problem in
adjuvant therapy is selecting patient subgroups to receive any particular
therapy. Data from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative
Group (EBCTCG) demonstrate that a relatively large proportion of
treated patients will relapse despite CMF or anthracycline-based
adjuvant therapy with or without tamoxifen. In the future we hope
to have a detailed bio-molecular "fingerprint" of each cancer that
will allow us to tailor an optimal approach for each patient, combined
with an appreciation of pharmacokinetic variation. Recent data using
microarray technology strongly indicate that "fingerprints" have
a very high degree of complexity (Perou, Ssrlie, Eisen, et al.,
2000).
The most critical
issue today is to find the optimal balance between patients who
should be offered adjuvant therapy and those who are at a sufficiently
low risk not to be offered such therapy. In addition, those selected
should be given a specific and targeted therapy that avoids the
problem of relapse. Cut-off levels and recommendations for adjuvant
therapy vary from country to country and region to region, most
likely reflecting medical, economic, or cultural differences.
Our goal is
to identify women who are at sufficiently low risk of relapse that
they need not be offered adjuvant chemotherapy. We will review data
from population-based cancer registries in the Nordic countries,
together with country-based and regional registries containing information
on adjuvant therapy modalities, as well as information from the
Swedish mammography program. This will be possible because the Nordic
countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden) have had
population-based cancer registries for several decades. The broad
coverage of these registries provides extensive data on the incidence
of cancer and on mortality from the various kinds of cancer. Information
on prognostic factors and on therapy, however, are not included
in these national registries, except for those of Denmark and Sweden.
Beginning in
1977, the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) began to develop a population-based
cancer registry (Mouridsen, personal communication). The registry
contains the names of around 60,000 Danish women who have had breast
cancer. The present annual incidence of breast cancer in Denmark
is around 3,500. A retrospective analysis of 30,000 women with breast
cancer made it possible to identify a group with a low risk of relapse
(Mouridsen, personal communication). This group consists of approximately
20 percent of the patients in the registry. "Low-risk" is defined
as a receptor-positive node-negative grade I (Bloom-Richardson)
primary cancer less than 20 mm. The patients in this low-risk group
were treated with mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery. Local
radiotherapy was administered to the breast parenchyma remaining
after breast-conserving surgery or to the scar area at the deep
resection border in the case of nonradical surgery (Mouridsen, personal
communication).
Using age-matched
controls, it was found that the 5-year survival rate for all premenopausal
Danish women (the control group) was 98 percent; the premenopausal
low-risk group with breast cancer had the same 5-year survival rate
of 98 percent (Mouridsen, personal communication). The corresponding
figure for the entire postmenopausal group was 92 percent, and for
the breast cancer cohort 91 percent (Mouridsen, personal communication).
The team at DBCG is presently analyzing the 10-year figures.
The Stockholm
(Sweden) Breast Cancer Group was established in 1976 and has a database
containing the names of around 20,000 breast cancer patients (Rutqvist,
personal communication). The annual incidence of new breast cancers
in the Stockholm-Gotland region is from 1,200 to 1,300, from a population
base of between 1.7 to 1.8 million. The registry covers between
85 and 90 percent of the women with breast cancer within that geographic
region. There is also an Uppsala-.rebro breast cancer registry in
Sweden that started operation on September 1, 1992. That registry
listed 10,610 patients as of August 25, 2000 (Degerman, personal
communication). The population base is around 1.9 million.
We will use
these registries to identify low-risk groups with a sufficiently
good prognosis that makes it unlikely that these women would benefit
from adjuvant therapy, as suggested by DBCG data or using other
criteria, with the assistance of Lars-Erik Rutqvist of Stockholm
and Lars Holmberg of Uppsala, Sweden, and their collaborators. With
the assistance of Lazlo Tabar of Falun, Sweden, we will also use
mammography-based data to identify low-risk groups.
References
Bergh J. Where
next with stem-cell-supported high-dose therapy for breast cancer?
[comment]. Lancet 2000;355:944-5.
Danish Breast
Cancer Group (DBCG). May 2000: Newsletter 32. Early Breast Cancer
Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Tamoxifen for early breast
cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998;351:1451-67.
Early Breast
Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Polychemotherapy
for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet
1998;352:930-42
Perou C, Sörlie
T, Eisen M, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.
Nature 2000;406:747-52.
|